VOLUME 05 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2026
Dr. Kingsley Ikwunga Amadi
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Administration and Management, Rivers State University, Nkpolu-Oroworukwo, PMB 5080, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i8n11Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study examined the relationship between psychological safety and employee performance of non-academic staff in state-owned universities in Rivers State. The dimensions of psychological safety were inclusion safety and contributor safety, while employee performance was measured in terms of task performance and contextual performance. The study adopted the cross-sectional research survey design. Primary data were generated through a structured questionnaire administered to non-academic staff of two Rivers State-owned universities. The population for the study was 1,470 non-academic staff, and a sample of 314 respondents was determined using the Taro Yamane's formula for sample size determination. Of the 314 copies of the questionnaire administered, 288 were duly completed, returned and found usable, and these formed the basis of the data analysis. The reliability of the instrument was achieved through the use of the Cronbach Alpha coefficient, with all items scoring above 0.70. The hypotheses were tested using the Spearman's Rank Order Correlation coefficient at a 0.05 level of significance and a 95% confidence interval, with the aid of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The findings revealed a strong, positive and significant relationship between inclusion safety and employee performance, and between contributor safety and employee performance, of non-academic staff in state-owned universities in Rivers State. The study therefore concludes that psychological safety significantly enhances employee performance in state-owned universities in Rivers State. This implies that when non-academic staff feel safe to be included and to contribute their views without fear of negative consequences, they are more likely to perform effectively both in their formal task requirements and in the discretionary, extra-role activities that support the university's overall functioning. The study recommends that the management of state-owned universities in Rivers State should institutionalise practices that promote inclusion safety, such as ensuring that diverse voices are genuinely heard in departmental decision-making, and should actively encourage contributor safety by protecting staff from ridicule or retaliation when they raise concerns, ask questions or propose new ideas.
KEYWORDS:Psychological Safety, Employee Performance, Inclusion Safety, Contributor Safety, Task Performance, Contextual Performance
REFERENCES1) Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1015921.\
2) Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.
3) Bankins, S. (2015). A process perspective on psychological contract change: Making sense of, and repairing, psychological contract breach and violation through employee coping actions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 2881–1095.
4) Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2017). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Routledge. (Original work published 1979)
5) Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 709–729.
6) Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Morrison, R. L. (2019). Give and take: Needed updates to social exchange theory. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(3), 317–322.
7) Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516.
8) Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
9) Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452.
10) Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). Russell Sage Foundation.
11) Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
12) Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43.
13) Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 787–799.
14) Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2016). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165.
15) Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
16) Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.
17) Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
18) Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785–804.
19) Li, J., Li, S., Jing, T., Bai, M., Zhang, Z., & Liang, H. (2022). Psychological safety and affective commitment among Chinese hospital staff: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and job burnout. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 1573–1585.
20) Lussier, R. N. (2005). Human relations in organizations: Applications and skill building (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
21) Mahmoud, M. A., Ahmad, S. B., & Poespowidjojo, D. A. L. (2022). Validation of the psychological safety, psychological empowerment, intrapreneurial behaviour and individual performance measurements. RAUSP Management Journal, 57(3), 219–234.
22) Mitchell, M. S., Cropanzano, R. S., & Quisenberry, D. M. (2012). Social exchange theory, exchange resources, and interpersonal relationships: A modest resolution of theoretical difficulties. In K. Törnblom & A. Kazemi (Eds.), Handbook of social resource theory (pp. 99–118). Springer.
23) Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966.
24) Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774.
25) Ogbo, R. N., Obiekwe, K. K., & Okorji, P. N. (2023). Principals' optimism, teachers' psychological safety and job performance in secondary schools of Enugu State, Nigeria. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 56–67.
26) Pelho, K. (2024). The impact of psychological safety on work engagement and work withdrawal: Exploring the mediating role of affective commitment (Master's thesis). University of Groningen.
27) Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. (2017). Employee performance at workplace: Conceptual model and empirical validation. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(1), 69–85.
28) Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212–236.
29) Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. John Wiley & Sons.
30) Shahzad, F., Luqman, R. A., Khan, A. R., & Shabbir, L. (2012). Impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: An overview. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 975–985.
31) Shields, J. (2011). Managing employee performance and reward: Concepts, practices, strategies. Cambridge University Press.
32) Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.
33) Werner, J. M. (2000). Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 3–24.
Cite this Article: Amadi, K. I. (2026). Psychological Safety and Employee Performance of Non-Academic Staff in State-Owned Universities in Rivers State. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(8), 2192-2201. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i8n11