VOLUME 05 ISSUE 07 July 2026
Sabina Ismayilova Vilayat
Baku State University PhD in Philology
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7711-7143
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i7n04Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Gender diversity in dialogic discourse emerges as one of the significant directions of the social functioning of language and is closely shaped by the social identity of participants in this type of discourse. The gender factor manifests itself not only at the structural level of language but more prominently in its use within communicative strategies, politeness forms, speech acts and discourse construction. The differences observed in the speech of male and female speakers are realized through mutually contrasting features such as cooperation and dominance, indirectness and directness of expression, as well as emotional and informative styles. The reflection of gender stereotypes in the meanings of linguistic units and lexical choices enables the verbalization of social relations and values within dialogic discourse that does not merely reflect existing gender differences but also functions as a social mechanism that reinforces or transforms them. The interaction of gender with other factors such as age, social status and cultural context determines the multifaceted nature of linguistic behavior. From this perspective gender diversity in dialogic discourse is evaluated as a complex manifestation of the relationship between language and society.
KEYWORDS:dialogic discourse, gender, sociolinguistics, social differentiation, speech behavior, language and society
REFERENCES1) Agabeyli V. Linguoculturology and gender issues. Textbook. Baku, 2023, 76 p.
2) Aghayeva K. Gender Study of Female and Male Language: Sexism in Azerbaijani Literary Samples. Proceedings of the II Republican Scientific Conference on Gender Issues and Modern Azerbaijan, Nov. 23, 2018, pp. 7-13.
3) Farajov A. Social Differentiation of Language. Author’s abstract of the dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baku, 2022, 30 p.
4) Gojayeva M. “The Initial Stage of the Evolution of the English Language and Its Main Features.” Language and Literature Journal, 2(125), pp. 120-123.
5) Holmes J. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman, 1995, 254 p.
6) Karakoç R. “Gender issues in dialogue.” Terminology Issues, No. 2, 2025, pp. 166–172.
7) Garibova L. Sociolinguistics. Textbook. Baku: Sim-Sim, 2025, 384 p.
8) Lakoff R. Language and woman’s place: Text and Commentaries (ed. M. Bucholtz). 2004. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/566290/mod_resource/content/1/Lakoff%20Language%20and%20Womans%20
Place_%20Text%20and%20Commentaries%202004%20red.pdf
9) Mills S. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 270 p.
10) Mukhtarova M. “Exposure of Androcentrism in Gender Linguistics and Its Impact on Modern English-Language Newspaper Discourse.” Philological Issues, No. 6, 2024, pp. 65–73.
11) Mursaliyeva, Kh. “The Concept of Gender in Azerbaijani Linguistics.” Proceedings of the II Republican Scientific Conference on Gender Issues and Modern Azerbaijan, November 23, 2018, pp. 122–123.
12) Naime J. S. Psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2009, p. 291.
13) Tannen D. Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, 240 p.
14) Seyidova N. “Explicit Information: Definition, Role and Applications in the Modern World.” Available at: https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/130238/papers/A_25.pdf
15) Zeynalova M. T. “The influence of gender and age characteristics on language use.” Proceedings of the XXV Republican Scientific Conference of Doctoral Students and Young Researchers (NASCO XXV), November 23–24, 2022, pp. 117–120.
16) https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/language-and-gender
Cite this Article:Vilayat, S. I. (2026). Sociolinguistic Aspects of Gender Diversity in Dialogic Discourse. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(7), 1861-1866. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i7n04