Tran Van Mong

Thu Dau Mot University

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i6n09

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

In the context of a socialist-oriented market economy and increasingly deep international integration, the private enterprise sector is increasingly asserting its important role in economic growth, job creation, and innovation promotion in Vietnam. To support the development of this sector, the State has issued many policies on credit, taxation, land, technological innovation, and improving the investment and business environment (Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam, 2017). However, the evaluation of the effectiveness of policies supporting private enterprises remains limited, lacks a systematic approach, and does not fully reflect the practical impact of these policies. This article focuses on analyzing the applicability of the CIPP (Context – Input – Process – Product) model in evaluating policies supporting the development of private enterprises in Vietnam. Based on a theoretical analysis of the CIPP model and the practical application of policies supporting private enterprises, this article points out the advantages of this model in comprehensively evaluating the policy context, input resources, implementation process, and output results of public policies (Stufflebeam, 2003). At the same time, the article proposes several solutions to improve the effectiveness of applying the CIPP model in evaluating policies supporting the development of private enterprises in Vietnam today. The findings indicate that the CIPP model enables a comprehensive evaluation of policy design, implementation capacity, governance effectiveness, and policy outcomes in supporting private enterprise development in Vietnam. The study also contributes to improving evidence-based policy evaluation and enhancing public governance in the context of administrative reform and digital transformation.

KEYWORDS:

CIPP model, policy evaluation, private enterprises, public administration, policy support.

REFERENCES
1) Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam. (2017). Resolution No. 10-NQ/TW dated June 3, 2017 on developing the private economy into an important driving force of the socialist-oriented market economy.

2) Ministry of Planning and Investment. (2023). Vietnam Enterprise White Paper 2023. Statistical Publishing House. https://www.gso.gov.vn/du-lieu-va-so-lieu-thong-ke/2023/04/sach-trang-doanh-nghiep-viet-nam-2023/

3) CIEM. (2023). Report on business environment reform.

4) Chelimsky, E. (2012). Public Policy Evaluation. Sage.

5) Government. (2020). Resolution No. 68/NQ-CP on reducing and simplifying regulations related to business activities in the period 2020–2025.

6) Government. (2021). Decree No. 80/2021/ND-CP detailing and guiding the implementation of some articles of the Law on Support for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.

7) Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis. Routledge.

8) Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Pearson.

9) Henry, G. T. (2001). How modern democracies are shaping evaluation and the emerging challenges for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200312

10) National Academy of Public Administration. (2021). State Management of the Economy. National Political Publishing House.

11) Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying Public Policy: Principles and Processes. Oxford University Press.

12) Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VCCI). (2023). Provincial Competitiveness Index (PCI) Report 2023. https://pcivietnam.vn/an-pham/bao-cao-pci

13) Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs. Jossey-Bass.

14) Nguyen Dang Thanh. (2020). Evaluating Public Policy in Current State Management. Journal of State Management, 295, 12–17.

15) Nguyen Minh Phuong. (2022). State administrative reform in the context of digital transformation in Vietnam. Journal of State Management, 317, 15–20.

16) Nguyen Thi Hong Hai. (2021). Enhancing the effectiveness of public policy evaluation in Vietnam. Journal of State Organization, 8, 22–27.

17) OECD. (2020). Policy evaluation: Insights from the OECD. OECD Publishing.

18) Patton, M. Q. (2018). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Sage Publications.

19) Pham Thi Giang Thu. (2021). Improving the current policy to support small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Journal of Legislative Research, 18(442), 45–51.

20) National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2017). Law on Supporting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises No. 04/2017/QH14.

21) National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2020). Law on Enterprises No. 59/2020/QH14.

22) Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

23) Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. Guilford Press.

24) Tran Anh Tuan. (2023). Digital transformation in supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Finance Magazine.

25) Tran Thi Hanh. (2022). Policies to support private enterprises in the context of post-COVID-19 economic recovery. Economics and Forecasting Magazine, 21, 34–38.

26) VCCI & USAID. (2023). PCI 2023 Report

27) Vedung, E. (2017). Public Policy and Program Evaluation.

28) Vo Kim Son. (2020). Public Management and State Administrative Reform. National Political Publishing House.

29) Vu Van Hien. (2019). Reform of the State Apparatus in Vietnam Today. National Political Publishing House.

30) Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation. Prentice Hall.

Cite this Article:Mong, T. V. (2026). Applying the Cipp Model in Evaluating Policies Supporting Private Enterprise Development in Vietnam. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(6), 1377-1384. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i6n09

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 June 2026