VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 June 2026
Nguyen The Vinh
Thu Dau Mot University, Ho Chi Minh City
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i6n06Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2026) added two breakthrough perspectives to the foreign policy line: “strategic autonomy” and “self-reliance.” These concepts not only inherit the tradition of “independence and self-reliance” but also represent a new development, consistent with the historical stature, culture, and new position of Vietnam after 40 years of Doi Moi. At the same time, they constitute a proactive response to the increasingly polarized international landscape dominated by US-China strategic competition. The Political Report of the 14th Congress affirms: “Strategic autonomy, self-reliance, self-confidence, and strong progress in the era of the nation’s rise” (Communist Party of Vietnam, 2026, p. 1). The article provides an in-depth analysis of the new connotations of these two concepts through official documents, including the Political Report of the 14th Congress and the guidance document of the Party Committee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2026). Using a comparative approach, the article contrasts Vietnam’s application of “strategic autonomy” with the approaches of India (Strategic Autonomy), Indonesia (Bebas-Aktif), and Turkey in the context of US-China competition. On this basis, the study proposes the Vietnamese Strategic Autonomy Model (VSAM) consisting of four pillars and a Party-led multilateral diplomacy model. Through this model, the article evaluates the adaptability of “bamboo diplomacy” in an increasingly polarized international environment in which middle powers face pressure to choose sides or be drawn into alliance blocs. The research results indicate that although Vietnam’s model demonstrates greater flexibility and resilience than some other cases, it still faces major challenges concerning endogenous capacity, economic-political risks, and technological pressure. The article concludes that strengthening comprehensive self-reliance will determine the practical effectiveness of strategic autonomy in the coming period and proposes the Party-led multilateral diplomacy model as an optimal institutional framework for Vietnam.
KEYWORDS:Strategic autonomy, self-reliance, Vietnam’s foreign policy, 14th National Congress, bamboo diplomacy, middle powers, US-China competition, VSAM model, multilateral diplomacy.
REFERENCES1) Acharya, A. (2018). The end of American world order (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
2) Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
3) Beckley, M., & Brands, H. (2022). Danger zone: The coming conflict with China. W. W. Norton & Company.
4) Buszynski, L., & Đỗ, T. H. (Eds.). (2020). The South China Sea: From a regional maritime dispute to geo-strategic competition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331480
5) Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. University of British Columbia Press.
6) Coplen, M. (2023). Soft power and the future of US foreign policy [Book review]. International Affairs, 99(6), 2551–2552. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad276
7) Communist Party of Vietnam. (2021). Documents of the 13th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (Vols. 1–2). National Political Publishing House.
8) Communist Party of Vietnam. (2026). Political Report of the 13th Central Committee at the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam (Draft document). Hanoi.
9) Party Committee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2026). Developing foreign affairs in the new era, commensurate with the historical stature, culture, and position of the country (Document presented at the National Conference). Hanoi.
10) George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
11) Hall, I. (2015). Is a “Modi doctrine” emerging in Indian foreign policy? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 69(3), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2014.1000263
12) Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam. (2024). Vietnam’s bamboo diplomacy: Theory and practice. National Political Publishing House.
13) Ho Chi Minh. (1961). Selected works (Vol. 4). Foreign Languages Publishing House.
14) Howorth, J. (2019). Strategic autonomy and European defence. In M. E. Smith, S. Duke, & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of European security (pp. 121–135). Routledge.
15) Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order. Yale University Press.
16) Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282
17) Kuik, C.-C. (2016). How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714
18) Kuik, C.-C. (2021). Hedging in international relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1901
19) Le, H. H. (2022). Vietnam’s hedging strategy against China since the 2014 oil rig crisis (ISEAS Perspective No. 2022/45). ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ISEAS_Perspective_2022_45.pdf
20) Mearsheimer, J. J. (2018). The great delusion: Liberal dreams and international realities. Yale University Press.
21) Posen, B. R. (2014). Restraint: A new foundation for U.S. grand strategy. Cornell University Press.
22) Storey, I. (2011). Southeast Asia and the rise of China: The search for security. Routledge.
23) Tunsjø, Ø. (2018). The return of bipolarity in world politics: China, the United States, and geostructural realism. Columbia University Press.
24) Walt, S. M. (2018). The hell of good intentions: America’s foreign policy elite and the decline of U.S. primacy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
25) Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
26) Womack, B. (2022). Asymmetry and international relationships. Cambridge University Press.
Cite this Article:Vinh, N. T. (2026). Strategic Autonomy and Self-Reliance in Vietnam’s Foreign Policy After the 14th National Congress – A Comparison with the Strategies of Middle Powers in the Context of Us-China Competition. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(6), 1345-1354. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i6n06