VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2026
1Prof. Dr. Pamir DİRİL, 2Özlem Kükçü
1St. Clements University/Department of Psychology Lecturer/U.K
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8913-343X
2St. Clements University/Psychology Department Master's Student
ORCID ID: 0009-0002-7111-5270
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i2n09ORCID ID: 0009-0002-7111-5270
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Criminal behaviour is too complex to be explained solely by individual choices, and numerous psychological, biological, and social factors play a role in its emergence. This study aims to understand the psychological foundations of criminal behaviour and addresses the topic within the framework of three fundamental scientific causes widely accepted in the literature. Firstly, biological factors, particularly genetic predispositions and neurological processes, are examined in terms of their impact on an individual's aggression and impulse control. Secondly, the contribution of individual psychological factors, such as personality traits, mental disorders, and cognitive distortions, to criminal behaviour is evaluated. Finally, the role of family structure, social environment, socio-economic conditions, and social learning processes in the development of criminal behaviour is addressed. In this context, the study aims to demonstrate that criminal behaviour cannot be reduced to a single cause but rather exhibits a multidimensional and interactive structure. It is believed that the findings will contribute to psychologically based approaches in crime prevention and rehabilitation processes.
KEYWORDS:Individual preferences, psychological, biological and social responses, genetic predispositions and neurological processes, aggression and impulse control, environmental factors
REFERENCES
1) American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
2) Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
3) Beaver, K. M., Barnes, J. C., & Boutwell, B. B. (2015). The nurture versus biosocial debate in criminology. SAGE Publications.
4) Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., Taylor, A., & Poulton, R. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297(5582), 851–854. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072290
5) Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
6) Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.
7) Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
8) Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Barnes, J. C. (2012). Violence in criminal careers: A review of the literature from a developmental life-course perspective. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 17(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.008
9) Siegel, L. J. (2018). Criminology: Theories, patterns, and typologies (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
10) Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology (11th ed.). General Hall.
11) Walsh, A., & Beaver, K. M. (2009). Biosocial criminology: New directions in theory and research. Routledge.
Cite this Article:DİRİL, P. D. P., & Kükçü, Ö. (2026). The Psychologıcal Foundatıons of Crımınal Behavıour. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(2), 332-337. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i2n09