VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2026
1Sutiasno, 2Ribka Novianeli
1Jenderal Soedirman University
2Jenderal Soedirman University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i2n08Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The use of horeg sound systems at social and cultural events such as weddings, festivals, and community gatherings has become deeply embedded in everyday practices within Indonesian society. Despite their cultural significance, the absence of clear and consistently enforced regulatory frameworks has resulted in recurrent public disturbances, particularly noise pollution that affects social order and community well being. Drawing on theories of public regulation and collaborative governance, this study examines the institutional and societal challenges encountered by local governments in regulating horeg sound system usage, while also identifying opportunities for participatory regulatory approaches. Using a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi structured interviews and surveys across several regions to capture both governmental and community perspectives. The findings reveal that regulatory effectiveness is constrained not only by limited enforcement capacity but also by fragmented public awareness and weak regulatory legitimacy. However, the study also highlights the potential of community-based participation to enhance compliance, legitimacy, and regulatory responsiveness. This research contributes to the governance literature by demonstrating how culturally embedded practices require adaptive and participatory regulatory strategies that move beyond command-and-control approaches, offering practical insights for balancing cultural expression with the protection of public order.
KEYWORDS:sound systems; horeg sound systems; festivals; cultural events
REFERENCES
1) Anderson, J. E. (2019). Public Policy-Making. New York: Routledge.
2) Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
3) Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
4) Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press.
5) Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Data Penggunaan Soundsystem pada Acara Pernikahan di Indonesia.
6) Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Statistik Perkawinan di Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS.
7) Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
8) Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
9) Braithwaite, J. (2004). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
10) Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
11) Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
12) Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
13) Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (2017). Smart regulation. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory theory (pp. 133–148). ANU Press.
14) Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.
15) Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
16) Johnson, R. (2022). Community Satisfaction and Event Noise: A Case Study. Journal of Social Events.
17) Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage Publications.
18) Lee, T. (2023). Harmonizing Noise Regulations: A National Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Policy.
19) Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing regulation: Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
20) Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310.
21) OECD. (2015). Regulatory policy outlook 2015. OECD Publishing.
22) Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.
23) Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. Macmillan.
24) Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.
25) Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.
26) Scott, C. (2004). Regulation in the age of governance: The rise of the post-regulatory state. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The politics of regulation (pp. 145–174). Edward Elgar.
27) Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2021). The Impact of Noise Pollution on Mental Health. Journal of Public Health Research.
28) Survei Masyarakat. (2023). Dampak Kebisingan dari Soundsystem Horeg di Indonesia.Jakarta: Penelitian Sosial.
29) Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
30) World Health Organization. (2018). Environmental noise guidelines for the European region. WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Cite this Article:Sutiasno, & Novianeli, R. (2026). Challenges and Opportunities in Regulating the use of Horeg Sound Systems: A Governance and Public Regulation Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(2), 326-331. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i2n08