Nagamurali Eragamreddy

University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i1n03

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study conducted an analysis of how speech acts in Toru Dutt’s sonnet, "The Lotus," operated at an ideological level, addressing a discrepancy between symbolic interpretations and pragmatics-based analysis. It evaluated how Searlean illocutionary categories were distributed between the octave and sestet, how illocutionary forces and perlocutionary emphasis indicated an ideology about cultural hierarchy and membership, using inquiries, assertion-evaluation, and expressive performatives, while using a postcolonial pragmatic approach that posited a transformed perspective about how data about symbolism alone could be interpreted. This qualitative, descriptive analysis used a coding manual, NVivo audit trail, and Cohen’s kappa evaluation, which helped validate the analysis. The process used a six-stage data collection process that included authoritative text retrieval, segmentation, pilot analysis, final analysis, and data triangulation. An analysis from locutionary segmentation through Searlean categorization helped create a CDA mapping. It was revealed that assertive statements were more commonly found in the octave, inquiries mediated contestations, while expressive statements were found more commonly in the sestet, and that inter-researcher reliability was above kappa = .81. This study asserted that speech-act analysis could help understand micro-analytical mechanisms, including ideology, that were performatized and that a replicable model enhanced and replaced symbolic interpretations about Indo-Anglian poems.

KEYWORDS:

Toru Dutt; speech acts; pragmatics; postcolonialism; Indo-Anglian poetry

REFERENCES

1) Anderson, B. (2008). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. In S. Seidman & J. C. Alexander (Eds.), The new social theory reader (2nd ed., pp. 282–288). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060963

2) Afzaal, M., Shanshan, X., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2024). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of speech acts in international journals (2013–2023). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2380556. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2380556

3) Anchimbe, E. A., & Janney, R. W. (2017). Postcolonial pragmatics. In A. Barron (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 105-120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925

4) Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.

5) Azhar, S. (2011). Toru Dutt. Indra Publishing.

6) Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.

7) Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

8) Bhargava, G., & Chaturvedi, S. (2019). Culture and society in the poems of Toru Dutt. The Creative Launcher, 4(3), 46-49.https://doi.org/10.53032/tcl.2019.4.3.06

9) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research inPsychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

10) Di Xie, & Sun, Y. (2024). Decolonizing English academic writing education through translingual practices. Linguistics and Education, 81, Article 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101307

11) Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse (pp. 9-14). Edward Arnold.

12) Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.).Routledge.

13) Fairclough, N. (2023). Critical discourse analysis. In M. Handford, J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.), (pp. 11-22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244

14) Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

15) Hamid, M. O., Sultana, S., & Roshid, M. M. (2025). Transformation of applied linguistics in the global south context of Bangladesh: Researcher agency, imagination, and north-south cooperation. Applied Linguistics, 46(4), 557-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae037

16) House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2025). Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching, 58(3), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000477

17) Kashima, Y., Perfors, A., Ferdinand, V., & Pattenden, E. (2021). Ideology, communication and polarization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), Article 20200133. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0133

18) LaDousa, C., & Davis, C. P. (Eds.). (2022). Language, education, and identity: Medium in SouthAsia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146278

19) LaDousa, C., Davis, C. P., & Choksi, N. (2022). Postcolonial language ideologies: Indian students reflect on mother tongue and English. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 32(3), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12378

20) Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

21) Liao, G., & Xia, D. (2023). Historical poem-quoting interaction: An interaction-speech act-ritual integrative study of fù in ancient China. Journal of Pragmatics, 214, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.06.008

22) Lootens, T. (2006). Bengal, Britain, France: The locations and translations of Toru Dutt. Victorian Literature and Culture, 34(2), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150306051321

23) McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

24) Munir, E., & Yavuz, M. A. (2024). Study of pragmatic analysis of literature on the development of ELT students’ receptive and productive skills: A case of North Cyprus. Heliyon, 10(21), e39558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39558

25) Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225593

26) Phillips, N. A. (2007). Claiming Her Own Context (s): Strategic Singularity in the Poetry of Toru Dutt. Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, 3(3), 1-9.

27) Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

28) Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge UniversityPress.

29) Tomasello, R. (2023). Linguistic signs in action: The neuropragmatics of speech acts. Brain and Language, 236, Article 105203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105203

30) Van Dijk, T. A. (1998a). Opinions and ideologies in the press. Approaches to media discourse, 21(63), 1-33.

31) van Dijk, T. A. (1998b). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage. http://digital.casalini.it/9781446265093

Cite this Article:Eragamreddy, N. (2026). Pragmatics and Ideology: Speech Acts in Toru Dutt’s the Lotus. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i1n03

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2026