¹Thi Hien Luong Le, ²Khanh Linh Nguyen, ³Huyen Nhung Nguyen

^1,2,3Student at College of Economics, Vinh University

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i1n13

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study synthesizes theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence regarding the risk appetite of young investors in the stock market within the contemporary digital landscape. Drawing upon classical finance theories, behavioral finance perspectives, and technology acceptance models, the paper demonstrates that risk appetite is not a fixed personal trait but rather a dynamic, context-dependent construct shaped by the interaction of cognitive, emotional, and technological forces. The review indicates that younger cohorts, such as Millennials and Generation Z, tend to exhibit higher risk acceptance due to longer investment horizons and their proficiency with financial technology (Fintech). However, the research also highlights the dual nature of financial knowledge and the "gamification" features of trading platforms, which can amplify overconfidence and impulsive investment behaviors. The paper proposes an integrative behavioral–technological perspective and emphasizes the need for future longitudinal studies to track the evolution of risk appetite across different market cycles to support effective policy-making and financial education.

REFERENCES

1) Antwi, J., & Naanwaab, C. B. (2022). Generational differences, risk tolerance, and ownership of financial securities: Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10020035

2) Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364

3) Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400

4) Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2002). Online investors: Do the slow die first? The Review of Financial Studies, 15(2), 455–488.https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.2.455

5) Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In G. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 1, pp. 1053–1128). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01027-6

6) Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310

7) Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849

8) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

9) Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

10) De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/261703

11) Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x

12) Glaser, M., & Weber, M. (2007). Overconfidence and trading volume. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 32(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10713-007-0003-3

13) Grable, J. E. (2000). Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk-taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(4), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022994314982

14) Grable, J. E., & Lytton, R. H. (1999). Financial risk tolerance revisited: The development of a risk assessment instrument. Financial Services Review, 8(3), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(99)00041-4

15) Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

16) Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

17) Nguyễn, T. L. H., & Lê, N. M. P. (2017). Herding behavior and investment decisions in the Vietnamese stock market. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(3), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2017.vol4.no3.23

18) Phan Trần Trung Dũng. (2020). Overconfidence and trading behavior of individual investors in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(3), 45–58.

19) Pokharel, J., & Maharjan, I. (2024). Financial behavior of Generation Z and Millennials. Journal of Emerging Management Studies, 1(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.3126/jems.v1i2.71522

20) Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164967

21) Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational exuberance (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.

22) Statman, M. (2014). Behavioral finance: Finance with normal people. Borsa Istanbul Review, 14(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2014.03.001

23) Thaler, R. H., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643

24) Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414

25) Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. American Psychological Association.

Cite this Article:Luong Le, T. H., Nguyen, K. L., & Nguyen, H. N. (2026). Factors Influencing Risk Appetite in Stock Market Investment among Young Investors: A Theoretical Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE HUMANITY & MANAGEMENT RESEARCHS, 5(1), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2026.v5i1n13

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2026