John Roldan C. Dimaano, LPT, MAED

Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng San Pablo, Brgy. San Jose, San Pablo City, Philippines

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i7n07

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study investigates the orientation of pre-service science teachers at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng San Pablo toward the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and assesses their science proficiency, with the goal of informing teacher preparation strategies. With the Philippines’ historically low performance in international assessments such as PISA—where only 22% of students reached the minimum level of science literacy—this research addresses a critical gap in teacher readiness and curriculum alignment. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 36 science education majors through surveys and PISA-aligned assessments that measured critical thinking, problem-solving, and information literacy. Findings reveal that awareness of PISA among participants is limited, with 52% having no prior knowledge of the program. Nonetheless, the respondents demonstrated generally positive attitudes and a moderate to high interest in integrating international benchmarks into their professional practices. Proficiency levels varied across the assessed domains, with the highest performance in problem-solving and the lowest in information literacy. A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.49) between PISA orientation and science proficiency suggests that increased familiarity with global standards may enhance teaching competence. The study underscores the need for curriculum reforms that incorporate international assessment frameworks and 21st-century skills development into teacher education. It also recommends targeted professional development to bridge existing gaps in scientific reasoning and digital literacy. By embedding global benchmarks into local teacher training programs, institutions can better prepare future educators to foster scientifically literate students and align national education outcomes with international expectations.

KEYWORDS:

PISA; Pre-service teachers; Readiness; Science proficiency; Scientific literacy

REFERENCES

1) Alinsunurin, J. (2021, June 10). Unpacking underperformance: Learning mindsets and the challenge of academic achievement among Filipino students. Retrieved from ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jason_Alinsunurin2/publication/352753691_Unpacking_u nderperformance_learning_mindsets_and_the_challenge_of_academic_achievement_among_F ilipino_students/links/60ddbfcba6fdccb745fb8339/Unpacking-underperformance-learning

2) Bernardo, A., Cordell, M., Calleja, M., Teves, J. M., Yap, S., & Chua, U. (2023). Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines using machine learning. Humanities and Social Science Communications.

3) Castagno-Dysart, D., Matera, B., & Traver, J. (2019, April 23). The importance of instructional scaffolding.

4) Retrieved from Teacher Evidence+Insight+Action: https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/the-importance-of-instructional-scaffolding

5) Dela Cruz, R. J. (2022). Science Education in the Philippines. Science Education in Countries Along the Belt & Road, 331-345.

6) Deped. (2024, September 14). DepEd convenes education partners to discuss PISA preps, other initiatives.

7) Retrieved from Department of Education: https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/09/15/deped- convenes-education-partners-to-discuss-pisa-preps-other-initiatives/

8) Goldman Center of Chicago. (2023). What is a standardized assessment? Retrieved from Goldman Center

9) Haw, J. Y., & King, R. B. (2023). Understanding Filipino students’ achievement in PISA: The roles of personal characteristics, proximal processes, and social contexts. Social Psychology of Education, 1089-1126.

10) Hernando-Malipot, M. (2023, December 7). 2022 PISA results a 'clear indication' that PH education system is in ‘worst state’ --- PBEd. Retrieved from Manila Bulletin:

11) https://mb.com.ph/2023/12/6/2022-pisa-results-a-clear-indication-that-ph-education-system-is- in-worst-state-pb-ed

12) Ioannidou, O., Georgiou, D., Obersteiner, A., Bas, N. D., & Mieslinger, &. C. (2017). Do Prospective Teachers Care About PISA Studies? A Pilot Study among University Students in Germany. International Education Studies, 26-36.

13) Jenkins, E., & Sjoberg, S. (2022). PISA: a political project and a research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 1-14.

14) Kollman, A. (2023). Using proficiency scales in science classes. Edutopia. Retrieved from Edutopia Presidential Communications Office. (2024, January 11). PBBM directs DepEd to focus on improving

15) teacher competency, feeding program and addressing bullying to improve PH’s PISA ranking. Retrieved from GOVPH: https://pco.gov.ph/news_releases/pbbm-directs-deped-to-focus-on- improving-teacher-competency-feeding-program-and-addressing-bullying-to-improve-phs-pisa- ranking/

16) Research Institute for Teacher Quality. (2023, December). RCTQ’s statement on the Philippines’

17) participation in PISA 2022. Retrieved from RITQ: https://www.ritq.ph/?page_id=4679 STEM Leadership Alliance. (2024, January 4). PISA Results an Opportunity to Accelerate Progress in

18) Education Quality. Retrieved from UNILAB Foundation: https://www.unilabfoundation.org/post/pisa-results-an-opportunity-to-accelerate-progress-in- education-quality

19) Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service Teachers’ Opinions about the Use of 21st Century Learner and

20) 21st Century Teacher Skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 181-197.

21) Villareas, H. J. (2024). Proficiency in Science Process Skills and Learners' Cognitive Performance in Manolo Fortich, Bukidnon. Instabright e-Gazette.

22) Yeasmin, S., & Mahmud, D. (2019). Acquiring Scientific and Technological Proficiency: State of Science Education in Bangladesh. Asian Journal Humanity, Art and Literature, 6(2), 169-184.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 07 JULY 2025