Hernán Tena Cortés

Tiermoyle I atterag, Nenagh CO Tipperary, Ireland CP F45CA39 candidate to PhD in Complex Thinking, Multiversidad Mundo Real, Mexico

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i6n12

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This article explores the pedagogical and epistemological implications of Edgar Morin’s hologrammatic principle within the field of TESOL (Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages). Grounded in the framework of Complex Thinking, the study analyses how seemingly minor language tasks in adult ESL instruction encapsulate and regenerate broader learning processes, including cognitive development, emotional engagement, and identity negotiation. Through an interpretative case study of synchronous online classes with Spanish-speaking adult learners, the research demonstrates that micro-tasks—such as pronunciation drills, grammar activities, and roleplays—function as holistic learning events that reflect the totality of language acquisition and personal development. Findings indicate that each classroom task can serve as a pedagogical hologram, containing within it the recursive dynamics of communicative competence, cultural awareness, and learner agency. The study proposes a shift from conventional task-based instruction to a task-hologrammatic approach, supported by curricular innovation, complexity-informed assessment, and a reimagining of the educator's role. Limitations include the cultural specificity of the participant group and the study’s confinement to synchronous virtual learning. Future research directions include longitudinal tracking, curriculum-level applications, and cross-cultural comparative studies. The article concludes that adopting the hologrammatic principle in TESOL fosters a richer, more humane educational practice aligned with the complexity of language, identity, and learning.

KEYWORDS:

Hologrammatic principle, Complex Thinking, TESOL, Micro-pedagogies, Communicative competence, Adult education, Identity and language learning, Task design, Holistic assessment, Epistemological complexity

REFERENCES

1) Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

2) Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Rowman & Littlefield.

3) Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford University Press.

4) Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

5) Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

6) Morin, E. (2006). El método 1: La naturaleza de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.

7) Morin, E. (2006). El método 5: La humanidad de la humanidad. La identidad humana. Madrid: Cátedra.

8) Morin, E. (1990). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa. Morin, E. (1999). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. París: UNESCO.

9) Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters. Rodríguez Arocho, W. (2021). La educación hologramática y transmetódica: Una visión desde la complejidad. Revista Educación y Ciudad, 41, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.46780/cunzac.v6i2.110

10) Roman, R., Jr., & Nunez, A. M. (2020). Motivational factors that influence English as a foreign language learners at Quality Leadership University, Panama City, Panama. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1104.03

11) Tobón, S. (2010). Formación basada en competencias: Pensamiento complejo y diseño curricular. Bogotá: ECOE Ediciones.

12) Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2025