¹Dr Obinwanne kelechukwu Aruomah, ²Ogochukwu Larry, Achara PhD, ³Ukonu Chosen-Tochi, ⁴Roseline Chinasa Agbaraevoh PhD

¹Department of Accountancy Abia State University, Uturu

²Department of Management Abia State University, Uturu

³Department of Marketing Abia State University, Uturu

⁴Department of Accounting Abia State University, Uturu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i11n14

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are pivotal to economic development, particularly in developing countries like Nigeria. This study explores the relationship between collective collaboration, networking, and wealth creation within Nigerian SMEs. Using a quantitative research design, data were collected from 300 SMEs across various sectors in Nigeria. The study employed structured questionnaires to gather data on collective collaboration, networking activities, and wealth creation metrics. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The findings reveal a significant positive relationship between collective collaboration, networking, and wealth creation in SMEs. The study concludes that fostering collective action and robust networking can enhance wealth creation in Nigerian SMEs, thereby contributing to economic growth and development.

KEYWORDS:

Collective Collaboration, Networking, SMEs, Wealth Creation, Nigeria

REFERENCES

1) Adebayo, O. (2022). Networking dynamics in Nigerian SMEs: The role of culture and digital platforms. Journal of African Business, 23(3), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2022.2046789

2) Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314

3) Akinwale, Y. O., Oluwatobi, S. O., & Olurinola, I. O. (2019). Innovation and SME performance in Nigeria: The mediating role of infrastructure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.017

4) Ariyo, D. (2005). Small firms are the backbone of the Nigerian economy. African Economic Analysis, 1(3), 1–13.

5) Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267-315.

6) Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

7) Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931-2943.

8) Chetty, S., & Holm, D. B. (2000). Internationalisation of small to medium-sized manufacturing firms: A network approach. International Business Review, 9(1), 77-93.

9) Coviello, N. E., & Munro, H. J. (1997). Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(4), 361-386.

10) Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

11) Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

12) Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

13) GSMA. (2022). Digital entrepreneurship in Nigeria: Leveraging mobile platforms for SME growth. GSM Association.

14) Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431.

15) Madichie, N. O., & Nkamnebe, A. D. (2020). Networking challenges in Nigerian SMEs: A institutional voids perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22145

16) Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation, learning and industrial organisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 127-150.

17) North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press

18) OECD. (2020). SME policy responses: Tackling COVID-19 and fostering recovery. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2a3ad5d0-en

19) Opute, A. P., Madichie, N. O., & Rahman, M. (2021). Networking and SME performance in emerging economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Business Research, 132, 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.056

20) Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

21) Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2010). SME clusters and networks in Nigeria: Practices, institutions, and innovation. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 1–24.

22) Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2010). SMEs and new technologies: Learning e-business and development. Springer Science & Business Media.

23) Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

24) Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective efficiency: Growth path for small-scale industry. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 529-566.

25) Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.

26) World Bank. (2020). Nigeria development update: Navigating the pandemic. World Bank Group.

27) Zengeni, K. T., & Zengeni, D. M. (2020). Collective action and SME performance in Tanzania: The role of institutional support. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(4), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-05-2019-0067

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 11 November 2025